|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Vančát Jaroslav, Doc. PhDr. Ph.D.
-
Grygar Štěpán, Prof. Mgr.
-
Fišerová Kristýna, Doc. MgA.
-
Veverka Zdeněk, Doc. MgA.
-
Sloupová Andrea, PhDr. Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Brozman Dušan, M.A.
-
Hulák Jiří, Mgr.
|
|
Course content
|
The content of the course is initially focused mainly on finding the heuristics of doctoral project solutions, considering design, support and inspiration sources, relevant theoretical frameworks. In the next phase, there are corrections of the student's proposed variations of the study plan, emphasis on the content within the studied subjects and the design of the doctoral project. An essential part is also the planning of adjustment, exposition and presentation of one's own work and its development in the conditions of a foreign internship and professional practice.
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
|
E-learning, Discussion, Multimedia supported teaching, Students' self-study, Self-study of literature, Lecture, Lecture with visual aids
|
| prerequisite |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| to recall the basic theoretical concepts describing the proposed doctoral project and its interpretive context, formulate and write down your ideas in a comprehensive language unit, independently search for theoretical support sources |
| Skills |
|---|
| interpret with the help of professional terms the plan of implementation of the doctoral project, analyze the theoretical context of this project, be aware of the values that form one's own opinions in the field of creation and its interpretation, articulate, cultivated and arguably these courts to the partners in the discussion, reflect different opinions, critically consider them and confront them with their own opinions, search for proven, systematic and respected sources of knowledge in the professional community and use them to enrich the personal and professional competence portfolio |
| Competences |
|---|
| N/A |
| N/A |
| learning outcomes |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| planning a doctoral study project, strategies for presenting the results of artistic or research work, argumentation in the dialogue conducted over the results of own and foreign work |
| Skills |
|---|
| better understands, reflects and describes the links of his own work to the broader socio-cultural context and theoretical context, understands the interpretation of its project in relation to the expected objectives and individual phases of its development, he is able to search for relevant information from relevant scientific fields and use it in the interpretation of his own and perceived work |
| Competences |
|---|
| define, according to the evolving context and available resources, assignments for professional activities, coordinate them and bear the ultimate responsibility for their results, using theoretical knowledge of the field, plan, support and manage the acquisition of additional professional knowledge, skills and competences for the successful completion of the doctoral project |
| teaching methods |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| Self-study of literature |
| Discussion |
| Skills |
|---|
| Individual study |
| One-to-One tutorial |
| Competences |
|---|
| Discussion |
| assessment methods |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| Project |
| Skills |
|---|
| Project |
| Competences |
|---|
| Kolokvium |
|
Recommended literature
|
-
Eco, Umberto. Jak napsat diplomovou práci. Olomouc : Votobia, 1997. ISBN 80-7198-173-7.
-
Liessmann, Konrad Paul. Teorie nevzdělanosti : omyly společnosti vědění. Vyd. 1. Praha : Academia, 2008. ISBN 978-80-200-1677-5.
-
Vicki Krohn Amorose. Art-Write: The Writing Guide for Visual Artists. Luminare Press/Eugene, Oregon, 2013. ISBN 978-1937303129.
|