Agassi, J., „Towards an Historiography of Science“, History and Theory 2, 1963, Beiheft 2, s. 1–116.
Aiton, E. J., „Galileo and the Theory of the Tides“, Isis 53, 1963, s. 265–266.
Algazi, A., „Scholars in Households: Refiguring the Learned Habitus, 1480–1550“, Science in Context 16, 2003, s. 9–42.
Arabatzis, T., „Can a Historian of Science be a Scientific Realist?“ Philosophy of Science 68, 2001, č. 3 – Supplement, s. S531–S541.
Arabatzis, T., „Rational versus Sociological Reductionism: Imre Lakatos and the Edinburgh School“, in: K. Gavroglu, J. Christianidis, E. Nicolaidis (eds.), Trends in the Historiography of Science, s. 177–192.
Ariew, R., „The Initial Response to Galileo’s Lunar Observation“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32, 2001, s. 571–581.
Ariew, R., „Theory of Comets at Paris During the Seventeenth Century“, Journal of the History of Ideas 53, 1992, s. 355–372.
Ariew, R., Barker, P., „Duhem and Continuity in the History of Science“, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 46, 1992, s. 323–343.
Ariew, R., Descartes and the Last Scholastics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca – London 1998.
Ashplant, T. G., Wilson, A., „Present-Centered History and the Problem of Historical Knowledge“, The Historical Journal 31, 1988, s. 253–274.
Ashplant, T. G., Wilson, A., „Whig History and Present-Centred History“, The Historical Journal 31, 1988, s. 1-16.
Atkinson, D., Peijnenburg, J., „Galileo and prior philosophy“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35, 2004, s. 115–136.
Aveni, A., Rozhovory s planetami. Jak věda a mýtus vynalezly vesmír, přel. Z. Majer, Tok, Praha 1998.
Aveni, A., Schody ke hvězdám. Astronomie dávných civilizací, přel. J. Rozehnal, M. Tichá, Dokořán – Argo, Praha 2004.
Baigrie, B. S., „Reappraisal of Duhem‘s Conception of Scientific Progress“, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 46, 1992, s. 344–360.
Baltas, A., „On the Harmful Effects of Excesive Anti-Whigism“, in: K. Gavroglu, J. Christianidis, E. Nicolaidis (eds.), Trends in the Historiography of Science, s. 107–119.
Barker, P., „Constructing Copernicus“, Perspectives on Science 10, 2002, s. 208–227.
Barker, P., Goldstein, B. G., „Realism and Instrumentalism in Sixteenth Century Astronomy: A Reappraisal“, Perspectives on Science 6, 1998, s. 232–258.
Barker, P., Goldstein, B. R., „Patronage and the Production of De revolutionibus“, Journal for the History of Astronomy 34, 2003, s. 345–367.
Barker, P., Goldstein, B. R., „Theological Foundations of Kepler’s Astronomy“, Osiris, 2nd Ser. 16, 2001, s. 88–113.
Barnes, B., Interests and the Growth of Knowledge, Routledge, London 1977.
Bechler, Z., Newton‘s Physics and the Conceptual Structure of the Scientific Revolution, Kluwer, Dordrecht – London – Boston, 1991.
Benedict, B. M., Curiosity. A Cultural History of Early Modern Inquiry, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2001.
Berger, P. L., Vzdálená sláva. Hledání víry ve věku lehkověrnosti, přel. P. Pšeja, Barrister & Principal, Brno 1997.
Bevir, M., „The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism“, History and Theory 31, 1992, s. 276–298.
Bevir, M., „When can we apply our concepts to the past?“ Scientia Poetica. Jahrbuch für Geschichte der Literatur und der Wissenschaften 8, 2004, s. 282-287.
Biagioli, M., „From Relativism to Contingentism“, in: P. Galison, D. J. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Context, and Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1996, s. 189-206.
Biagioli, M., „The Social Status of Italian Mathematicians, 1450-1600“, History of Science 27, 1989, s. 41–95.
Biagioli, M., Galileo, the Courtier. The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1993.
Bialas, V., Allgemeine Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Philosophische Orientierungen, Böhlau, Wien – Köln 1990.
Bietenhard, H., Die himmlische Welt im Urchristentum und Spätjudentum, Mohr, Tübingen 1951.
Bijsterveld, K., „The City of Din“: Decibels, Noise, and Neighbors in the Netherlands, 1910-1980, Osiris, 2nd Ser. 18 (2003), s. 173–193.
Blackwell, R. J., Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame – London 1991.
Blair, A., „Tycho Brahe’s Critique of Copernicus and the Copernican System“, Journal of the History of Ideas 51, 1990, s. 355–377.
Bloor, D., Knowledge and Social Imagery, Routledge & Paul, London 1976.
Blum, P. R., Giordano Bruno, Beck, München 1999.
Blumenberg, H., Die Genesis der kopernikanischen Welt, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 1975, 31996.
Blumenberg, H., Die Legitimität der Neuzeit. Erneuerte Ausgabe, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 1996.
Blumenberg, H., Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 1998.
Boas-Hall, M., The Scientific Renaissance, 1450–1630 [1962], Dover, New York 31994.
Böhme, H., Matussek, P., Müller, L., Orientierung: Kulturwissenschaft, Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg 2000, 20022.
Bono, J. J. The Word of God and the Languages of Man. Interpreting Nature in Early Modern Science and Medicine. Vol. 1.: Ficino to Descartes, Univesity of Wisconsin Press, Madison 1995.
Bornkamm, H., Das Jahrhundert der Reformation. Gestalten und Kräfte, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1961.
Boschiero, L., „Stories About the Birth of Modern Science“, Minerva 43, 2005, s. 311-318.
Bowker, G., Latour, B., „A Booming Discipline Short of Discipline: (Social) Studies of Science in France“, Social Studies of Science 17, 1987, s. 715–748.
Bowler, P. J., „Malthus, Darwin, and the Concept of Stuggle“, Journal of the History of Ideas 37, 1976, s. 631–650.
Brague, R., Die Weisheit der Welt. Kosmos und Erfahrung im westlichen Denken, Beck, München 2006.
Brewster, D., The Life of Sir Isaac Newton, Harper & Brothers, New York 1836
Broad, W. J., „History of Science Losing Its Science“, Science 207, 1980, s. 389.
Brooke, J. H., „Does history of science have a future?“ British Journal for the History of Science 32, 1992, s. 1–20.
Brooke, J. H., „Religious Belief and the Content of the Sciences“, Osiris, 2nd Ser. 16, 2001, s. 3–28.
Brooke, J. H., Cantor, G., Reconstructing Nature. The Engagement of Science and Religion, Oxford University Press, New York – Oxford 1998.
Brooke, J. H., Science and Religion. Some Historical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991, 142005.
Brown, H. I., „Galileo, the Elements and the Tides“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 7, 1976, s. 337–351.
Brush, S. G., „Anachronism and the History of Science: Copernicus as an Airplaine Passenger“, Scientia Poetica. Jahrbuch für Geschichte der Literatur und der Wissenschaften 8, 2004, s. 255–270.
Brush, S. G., „Scientists as Historians“, Osiris, 2nd Ser. 10, 1995, s. 214–231.
Buchdahl, G., „On the Presuppositions of Historians Science“, History of Science 1, 1962, s. 67–77.
Burian, R. M., „More Than a Marriage of Convenience: On the Inextricability of History and Philosophy of Science“, Philosophy of Science 44, 1977, s. 1–42.
Burian, R. M., „Precarious Relationship between History and Philosophy of Science“, Perspectives on Science 10, 2002, s. 398–407.
Burian, R. M., „The Dilemma of Case Studies Resolved: The Virtues of Using Case Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science“, Perspectives on Science 9, 2001, s. 383–404.
Burstyn, H. L., „Galileo’s Attempt to Prove that the Earth Moves“, Isis 53, 1962, s. 161–185.
Butterfield, H., The Origins of Modern Science, 1300-1800 [1949], Macmillan, New York 19593.
Bynum, W. F., Browne, E. J., Porter, R. (eds.), Dictionary of the History of Science, Macmillan, London 1985.
Byrne, J. S., „A Humanist History of Mathematics? Regiomontanus’s Padua Oration in Context“, Journal of the History of Ideas 67, 2006, s. 41–61.
Cabral, R., „Herbert Butterfield as a Christian Historian of Science“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 27, 1996, s. 547–564.
Caneva, K. L., „Objectivity, Relativism, and the Individual: a Role for a Post-Kuhnian History of Science“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29, 1998, s. 327–344.
Canguilhem, G., Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Epistemologie. Gesammelte Aufsätze, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 1979.
Capra, F., Bod obratu. Věda společnost a nová kultura, přel. M. Štýs, Dharma Gaia, Praha 2002.
Carrier, M., „Der Wandel der Wissensformen. Zur Vielfalt und Rationalität der Wissenschaftsgeschichte“, in: J. Büschenfeld (ed.), Wissenschaftsgeschichte heute: Festschrift für Peter Lundgren, Verlag für Regionalgeschichte, Gütersloh 2001, s. 211–231.
Carrier, M., „Wissenschaftsgeschichte, rationale Rekonstruktion und die Begründung von Methodologien“, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie XVII/2, 1986, s. 201–228.
Castagneti, G., Camerota, M., „Antonio Favaro and the Edizione Nazionale of Galileo’s Works“, Science in Context 13, 2000, s. 597–609.
Clagett, M., Greek Science in Antiquity, Abelard – Schuman, London 1957.
Clark, W., „Narratology and the History of Science“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26, 1995, s. 1–71.
Cohen, I. B. (ed.), Puritanism and the rise of modern Science: The Merton Thesis, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick 1990.
Cohen, I. B., „Harvard Education“, Isis 75, 1984, s. 13–21.
Cohen, I. B., Revolution in Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. – London 1985, 71995.
Collins, H., Pinch, T., The Golem. What everyone should know about science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993.
Cooter, R., Crosland, M., Easlea, B., Gooding, D., Hall, A. R., Hendry, J., „What is History of Science?“ History Today 35, 1985, č. 4, s. 32–40.
Copenhaver, B. P., „A Tale of Two Fishes: Magical Objects in Natural History from Antiquity Through the Scientific Revolution“, Journal of the History of Ideas 52, 1991, s. 373–398.
Copenhaver, B. P., „Did Science Have a Renaissance“, Isis 83, 1992, s. 387–407.
Copenhaver, B. P., „Jewish Theologies of Space in the Scientific Revolution: Henry More, Joseph Raphson, Isaac Newton and their Predecessors,“ Annals of Science 37, 1980, s. 489–548.
Crombie, A. C., „Beginnings at Oxford“, Isis 75, 1984, s. 25–28.
Crombie, A. C., Science, Art and Nature in Medieval and Modern Thought, Hambledon Press, London – Rio Grande 1996.
Crombie, A. C., The History of Science from Augustine to Galileo [orig. Augustine to Galileo, The History of Science, A. D. 400-1650, 1952], Dover, New York 1995.
Cunningham, A., „Getting the Game Right: Some Plain Words on the Identity and Invention of Science“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 19, 1988, s. 365–389.
Cunningham, A., „How the Principia Got Its Name: Or, Taking Natural Philosophy Seriously“, History of Science 29, 1991, s. 377–392.
Cunningham, A., „Science and Religion in the Thirteenth Century Revisited: The Making of St Francis the Proto-Ecologist, Part 1: Creature not Nature“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31, 2000, s. 613–643; „Part 2: Nature Not Creature“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32, 2001, s. 69–98.
Cunningham, A., Williams, P., „De-centring the „big picture“: The Origins of Modern Science and the modern origins of science“, British Journal for the History of Science 26, 1993, s. 407–432.
Damasio, A., Hledání Spinozy. Radost, strach a citový mozek, přel. L. Motlová, A. Hesová, Mladá fronta, Praha 2004.
Dannenberg, L., Säkularisierung in den Wissenschaften seit der frühen Neuzeit. Bd. 3. Die Anatomie des Text-Körpers und Natur-Körpers. Das Lesen im liber naturalis und supernaturalis, De Gruyter, Berlin – New York 2003.
Daston, L., “The Moralized Objectivities of Science“, in: W. Carl – L. Dastonová (eds.), Wahrheit und Geschichte: Ein Kolloquium zu Ehren des 60. Geburtstages von Lorenz Krüger, Göttingen 1999, s. 78–100.
Daston, L., „Die Kultur der wissenschaftlichen Objektivität“, in: M. Hagner (ed.), Ansichten der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, s. 137–158.
Daston, L., „Historische Überlegungen zum Antropomorphismus und zur Objektivität in den Wissenschaften“; in: B. O. Küppers (ed.), Die Einheit der Wirklichkeit: zum Wissenschaftsverständnis der Gegenwart, München 2000, s. 27–44.
Daston, L., „History of Science in an Elegiac Mode. E. A. Burtt’s Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science Revisited“, Isis 82, 1991, s. 522–531.
Daston, L., „Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early Modern Europe“, Critical Inquiry 18, 1991, s. 93–124.
Daston, L., „Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective“, Social Studies of Science 22, 1992, s. 597–618.
Daston, L., „The Moral Objectivity of Science“, Osiris, 2nd Ser. 10, 1995, s. 2–24.
Daston, L., P. Galison, „The Image of Objectivity“, Representations 40, 1992, s. 81–128.
Daston, L., Park, K. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 3. Early Modern Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
Daston, L., Sibun, H. D., „Introduction: Scientific Personae and Their Histories“, Science in Context 16, 2003, s. 1–8.
Daston, L., Wunder, Beweise und Tatsachen. Zur Geschichte der Rationalität, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 2001, 22003.
Dawkins, R., Sobecký gen, přel. V. Kopský, Mladá fronta, Praha 1998.
De Gandt, F., Force and Geometry in Newton’s Principia, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1995.
Dear, P., „Religion, Science and Natural Philosophy? Thoughts on Cunningham Thesis“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32, 2001, s. 377–386.
Dear, P., „Totius in Verba: Rhetoric and Authority in the Early Royal Society“, Isis 76, 1985, s. 144–161.
Dear, P., „What Is the History of Science the History of?“ Isis 96, 2005, s. 390–406.
Dear, P., Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1995.
Dear, P., Revolutionizing the Sciences. European Knowledge and Its Ambitions, 1500-1700, Palgrave, Basingstoke – London 2001.
Delumeau, J., Dějiny ráje. Zahrada rozkoše, přel. Z. Müller, Argo, Praha 2003.
Dennis, M. A., „Historiography of Science. An American Perspective“, in: J. Krige, D. Pestre (eds.), Science in the Twentieth Century, Amsterdam 1997, s. 1–26.
Dierig, S., Lachmund, J., Mendelsohn, J. A., „Introduction: Towards an Urban History of Science“, Osiris, 2nd Ser. 18, 2003, s. 1–19.
Dijksterhuis, E. J., The Mechanization of the World Picture [1950], Clarendon Press, Oxford 1961.
Dinzelbacher, P., Poslední věci člověka. Nebe, peklo, očistec ve středověku, přel. P. Babka, Vyšehrad, Praha 2004.
Dobbs, B. J. T., „Newton as Final Cause and First Mover“, Isis 85, 1994, s. 633–643, repr. in M. Osler (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, s. 25–39.
Dobbs, B. J. T., Jacob, M. C., Newton and the Culture of Newtonianism, Humanities Press, New Jersey 1995.
Dobbs, B. J. T., The Foundations of Newton‘s Alchemy or The Hunting of the Green Lyon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge – New York 1975.
Dobbs, B. J. T., The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton‘s Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge – New York 1991.
Doel, R. E. – Söderqvist, T. (eds.), The Historiography of Contemporary Science, Technology and Medicine. Writing recent science, Routledge, London – New York 2006.
Drake, S., „Galileo’s Experimental Confirmation of Horizontal Intertia: Unpublished Manuscripts (Galileo Gleanings XXII)“, Isis 64, 1973, s. 291–305.
Eastwood, B. S., „On the Continuity of Western Science from the Middle Ages: A. C. Crombie’s Augustine to Galileo“, Isis 83, 1992, s. 84–99.
Elders, L., Filosofie přírody u sv. Tomáše Akvinského, přel. A. Cejnarová, OIKOYMENH, Praha 2003.
Eliade, M., Mýtus o věčném návratu, přel. E. Streibingerová, OIKOYMENH, Praha 1993.
Elias, N., O procesu civilizace. Sociogenetické a psychogenetické studie [1939], přel. J. Boček, Argo, Praha 2006.
Engelhardt, D. von, Historisches Bewusstsein in der Naturwissenschaft von der Aufklärung bis zum Positivismus, Alber, Freiburg – München 1979.
Fara, P., Newton. Formování génia, přel. V. Marek, BB Art, Praha 2004.
Fellmann, F., Scholastik und kosmologische Reform, Aschendorff, Münster 1971.
Felt, U., Nowotny, H., Taschwer, K., Wissenschaftsforschung. Eine Einführung, Campus, Frankfurt a. M. – New York 1995.
Ferngren, G. B., (ed.), Science and Religion. A Historical Introduction, Garland, Baltimore – London 2002.
Feyerabend, P. K., Rozprava proti metodě, přel. J. Fiala, Aurora, Praha 2001.
Figala, K., „Newton as Alchemist“, History of Science 15, 1977, s. 102–137.
Findlen, P., „The Two Cultures of Scholarship?“ Isis 96, 2005, s. 230–237.
Fine, A., „Science Made Up: Constructivist Sociology of Scientific Knowledge“, in P. Galison – D. J. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Context, and Power, s. 231–254.
Finocchiaro, M. A., „Methodological Judgment and Critical Reasoning in Galileo’s Dialogue“, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994, Vol. 2, s. 248–257.
Finocchiaro, M. A., „Science, Religion, and the Historiography of the Galileo Affair: On the Undesirability of Oversimplification“, Osiris, 2nd Ser. 16, 2001, s. 114–131.
Finocchiaro, M. A., „To Save the Phenomena: Duhem on Galileo“, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 46, 1992, s. 291–310.
Finocchiaro, M. A., Retrying Galileo, 1633-1992, University of California Press, Berkeley – Los Angeles – London 2005.
Floris Cohen, H., The Scientific Revolution. A Historiographical Inquiry, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1994.
Fontana, J., Evropa před zrcadlem, přel. J. Kasl, Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, Praha 2001.
Forbes, R. J., Dijksterhuis, E. J., A History of Science and Technology, 2 sv., Penguin Books, Harmondsworth 1963.
Force, J. E., „The Nature of Newton’s „Holy Alliance“ between Science and Religion: From the Scientific Revolution to Newton (and Back Again)“, in: M. Osler (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, s. 247–270.
Force, J. E., Popkin, R. H. (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands of Spinoza's Time and the British Isles of Newton's Time, Kluwer, Dordrecht – Boston – London 1994.
Forgan, S., „The Architecture of Display: Museums, Universities and Objects in Nineteenth-Century Britain“, History of Science 32, 1994, s. 139–162.
Forman, P., „Independence, Not Transcendence, for the Historian of Science“, Isis 82, 1991, s. 71–86.
Foucault, M., Archeologie vědění, přel. Č. Pelikán, Herrmann & synové, Praha 2002.
Fox, R., „Fashioning the Discipline: History of Science in the European Intellectual Tradition“, Minerva 44, 2006, s. 410–432.
Frasca-Spada, J., Jardine, N. (eds.), Books and the Sciences in History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000.
Freudentahl, G., Atom und Individuum im Zeitalter Newtons. Zur Genese der mechanistischen Natur- und Sozialphilosophie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 1982.
Funkenstein, A., Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1986.
Gale, B. G., „Darwin and the concept of a struggle for existence: a study in the extrascientific origins of scientific ideas“, Isis 63, 1972, s. 321–344.
Galison, G., History, „Philosophy, and the Central Metaphor“, Science in Context 2, 1988, s. 197–212.
Galison, P., D. J. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Context, and Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1996.
Galison, P., Einsteinovy hodiny a Poincarého mapy. Říše času, přel. J. Fiala, Mladá fronta, Praha 2005.
Garber, D., Descartes‘ Metaphysical Physics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago – London 1992.
Gavroglu, K., Christianidis, J., Nicolaidis, E. (eds.), Trends in the Historiography of Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht – Boston – London 1994.
Gavroglu, K., Christianidis, J., Nicolaidis, E., (eds.), Trends in the Historiography of Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht – Boston – London 1994.
Geertz, C., Interpretace kultur. Vybrané eseje, přel. H. Červinková, V. Hubinger, H. Humlíčková, SLON, Praha 2000.
Giere, R. N., „History and Philosophy of Science: Intimate Relationship or Marriage of Convenience?“ The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24, 1973, s. 282–297.
Gillispie, Ch. C. (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 16 sv., Ch. Soribner, New York 1970-1980.
Gillispie, Ch. C., The Edge of Objectivity. An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1960.
Gingerich, O., „The Trouble with Ptolemy“, Isis 93, 2002, s. 70–74.
Gingerich, O., „Truth in Science: Proof, Persuasion, and the Galileo Affair“, Science & Christian Belief 16, 2004, s. 13–26.
Gingerich, O., An Annotated Census of Copernicus‘ De revolutionibus, Brill, London – Boston – Köln 2002.
Gingerich, O., The Book Nobody Read. Chasing the Revolution of Nicolaus Copernicus, Penguin Books, New York 2004.
Gingerich, O., The Eye of Heaven. Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler, AIP Press, New York 1993.
Ginzburg, C., Sýr a červi. Svět jednoho mlynáře kolem roku 1600, přel. J. Špaček, Argo, Praha 2000.
Goertz, H.-J., Umgang mit Geschichte. Eine Einführung in die Geschichte, Rowohlt, Hamburg 1995.
Goertz, H.-J., Unsichere Geschichte. Zur Theorie historischer Referentialität, Reclam, Stuttgart 2001.
Goldman, S. L., „Alexander Kojéve on the Origin of Modern Science: Sociological Modelling Gone Awry“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 6, 1975, s. 113–125.
Golinski, J., „The Care of the Self and The Masculine Birth of Science“, History of Science 40, 2002, s. 1–21.
Golinski, J., „The Theory of Practice and the Practice of Theory: Sociological Practices in the History of Science“, Isis 81, 1990, s. 492–505.
Golinski, J., Making Natural Knowlege. Constructivism and the History of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago – London 1998, 20052.
Gould, S. J., Jak neměřit člověka. Pravda a předsudky v dějinách hodnocení lidské inteligence, přel. A. Markoš, Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, Praha 1997.
Goulding, R., „Histories of Science in Early Modern Europe“, Journal of the History of Ideas 67, 2006, s. 33–40.
Graham, L., „The Socio-political Roots of Boris Hessen: Soviet Marxism and the History of Science“, Social Studies of Science 15, 1985, s. 705–722.
Graham, L., „Why Can’t History Dance Contemporary Ballet? Whig History and the Evils of Contemporary Dance“, Science, Technology & Values 6, 1981, s. 3–6.
Grant, E., A History of Natural Philosophy. From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007.
Grant, E., Planets, Stars and Orbs. The Medieval Cosmos, 1200-1687, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994.
Grant, E., The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages. Their Religious, Institutional, and Intellectual Contexts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
Grant, G., „The Condemnation of 1277, God’s Absolute Power, and Physical Thought in the Late Middle Ages“, Viator 10, 1979, s. 211–244.
Grattam-Guiness, I., „Does History of Science Treat of The History of Science? The Case of Mathematics“, History of Science 28, 1990, s. 149–173.
Gregersen, F., Koppe, S., „Against Epistemological Relativism“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 19, 1988, s. 447–487.
Gregory, F., „The Historical Investigation of Science in North America“, Zeitschrifft für allgeimene Wissenschaftstheorie XVI/1, 1985, s. 151–165.
Guicciardini, N., „Conceptualism and contextualism in the recent historiography of Newton’s Principia“, Historia Mathematica 30, 2003, s. 407–431.
Hacking, I., Sociálna konštrukcia – ale čoho? Čo je a čo nie je sociálnou konštrukciou, přel. J. Šebesta, Kalligram, Bratislava 2006.
Hadot, P., Philosophy as a Way of Life. Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, transl. M. Ch. Malden, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford 1995.
Hagner, M. (ed.), Ansichten der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 2001.
Hagner, M., „Ansichten der Wissenschaftsgeschichte“, in: Hagner, M. (hrsg.), Ansichten der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, s. 7-33.
Hagner, M., Kluge Köpfe und geniale Gehirne. Zur Anthropologie des Wissenschaftlers im 19. Jahrhundert, in: Hagner, M. (ed.), Ansichten der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, s. 227–268.
Hagner, M., Rheinberger, H. J., Wahrig-Schmidt, B. (eds.), Objekte, Differenzen und Konjunkturen. Experimentalsysteme im historischen Kontext, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 1994.
Hagner, M., Rheinberger, H. J., Wahrig-Schmidt, B. (eds.), Räume des Wissens. Repräsentation, Codierung, Spur, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin 1995.
Hakfoort, C., „The Missing Syntheses in the Historiography of Science“, History of Science 19, 1991, s. 207–216.
Hall, A. R., „Beginnings in Cambridge“, Isis 75, 1984, s. 22–25.
Hall, A. R., „Merton Revisited“, History of Science 2, 1963, s. 1–16.
Hall, A. R., „On Whiggism“, History of Science 21, 1983, s. 45–59.
Hall, A. R., From Galileo to Newton [1963], Dover, New York 21981.
Hankins, T. L., „In Defense of Biography: The Use of Biography in the History of Science“, History of Science 17, 1979, s. 1–16.
Hannaway, O., „Laboratory Design and the Aim of Science: Andreas Libavius versus Tycho Brahe“, Isis 77, 1986, s. 584–610.
Harrison, E., „Whigs, prigs and historians of science“, Nature 329, 1987, s. 213–14.
Harrison, P., „Curiosity, Forbidden Knowledge, and the Reformation of Natural Philosophy in Early Modern England“, Isis 92, 2001, s. 265–290.
Harrison, P., „Voluntarism and Early modern Science“, History of Science 40, 2002, 63–89.
Harrison, P., The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
Heilbron, J. L., „Applied History of Science“, Isis 78, 1987, s. 552–563.
Heintz, B., „Wissenschaft im Kontext. Neuere Entwicklungstendenzen in der Wissenschaftssoziologie“, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 45, 1993, s. 528-552.
Heisenberg, W., Fyzika a filosofie, přel. M. Král, Svoboda, Praha 1966.
Henry, J., „Pray do not ascribe that notion to me: God and Newton’s Gravity“, in: J. E. Force, R. H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scriptures, s. 123–147.
Hentschel, K., „Der Vergleich als Brücke zwischen Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Wissenschaftstheorie“, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34, 2003, s. 251–273.
Hesse, M., „Reasons and Evaluation in the History of Science“, in: M. Teich, R. Young (eds.), Changing Perspectives in the History of Science: Essays in Honor of John Needham, Heinemann, London – Dordrecht 1973, s. 125–147.
Hesse, M., M., „Rationality and Generalization of Scientific Style“, in: J. D. North, J. J. Roche (eds.), Light of Nature. Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science presented to A. C. Crombie, Nijhoff, Dordrecht 1985, s. 365–381.
Hiebert, E. N., „Modern Physics and Christian Faith“, in: D. C. Lindberg, R. L. Numbers (eds.), God and Nature, s. 424–447
Holton, G., Věda a antivěda, přel. O. Jelínek, Academia, Praha 1999.
Hooykaas, R., „Historiography of Science, Its Aims and Methods“, Organon 7, 1970, s. 37–49.
Hooykaas, R., Religion and the Rise of Modern Science, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh – London 1972.
Horyna, B., Teorie metafory. Metaforologie Hanse Blumenberga, Nakladatelství Olomouc, Olomouc 2007.
Horyna, B., Úvod do religionistiky, OIKOYMENH, Praha 1994.
Hoskin, M. A., „Newton, Providence and the Universe of Stars“, Journal for the History of Astronomy 8, 1977, s. 77–101.
Howell, K. J., God’s Two Books. Copernican Cosmology and Biblical Interpretation in Early Modern Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame 2002.
Hübner, J., Die Theologie Johannes Keplers zwischen Orthodoxie und Naturwissenschaft, Mohr, Tübingen 1975.
Hughes, J., „Whigs, Prigs and Politics: Problems in the Historiography of Contemporary Science“, in: T. Söderqvist (ed.), The Historiography of Contemporary Science and Technology, s. 19–37.
Hull, D. L., „In Defense of Presentism“, History and Theory 18, 1979, s. 1–15.
Hutchison, K., „Supernaturalism and the Mechanical Philosophy“, History of Science 21, 1983, s. 297–333.
Chandrasekhar, S., Newton’s Principia For the Common Reader, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1995.
Chapman, A., Bohové na nebesích. Astronomie, náboženství a kultura od starověku až po renesanci, přel. R. Damová, BB Art, Praha 2003.
Chimisso, Ch., „Heléne Metzger: The History of Science between the Study of Mentalities and total History“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32, 2001, s. 203–241.
Christie, J. R. R., „Aurora, Nemesis and Clio“, British Journal for the History of Science 26, 1993, s. 391–405.
Christie, J. R. R., „The development of the historiography of science“, in: R. C. Olby (ed.), Companion to the history of modern science, s. 5–22.
Iliffe, R., „Is he like other men? The meaning of the Principia Mathematica, and the author as idol“, in: G. Maclean (ed.), Culture and Society in the Stuart Restoration. Literature, Drama, History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995, s. 159–176.
Iliffe, R., „Isaac Newton, Lucatello Professor of Mathematics“, in: Ch. Lawrence, S. Shapin (eds.), Science Incarnate, s. 121–155.
Iliffe, R., „Rational Artistry“, History of Science 26, 1998, s. 329–357.
Jacob, J. R., „Boyle’s Atomism and the Restoration assault on pagan naturalism“, Social Studies of Science 8, 1978, s. 211–233.
Jacob, J. R., „Restoration ideologies and the Royal Society“, History of Science 18, 1980, s. 25–38.
Jacob, J. R., „The ideological origins of Robert Boyle’s natural philosophy“, Journal of European Studies 2, 1972, s. 1–21.
Jacob, J. R., The Scientific Revolution: Aspirations and Achievements, 1500-1700, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands 1998.
Jacob, M. C., „Reflections on the Ideological Meanings of Western Science From Boyle and Newton to the Postmodernists“, History of Science 33, 1995, s. 333–357.
Jacob, M. C., The Cultural Meaning of Scientific Revolution, Alfred A. Knopf, New York 1988.
Jacob, M. C., The Newtonians and the English Revolution, 1689-1720, Harvester Press, New York 1976.
Jardine, N., „Koyré’s Kepler/Kepler’s Koyré“, History of Science 38, 2000, s. 363–376.
Jardine, N., „Uses and Abuses of Anachronism in the History of the Sciences“, History of Sciences 38, 2000, s. 251–270.
Jardine, N., „Whigs and Stories: Herbert Butterfield and the Historiography of Science“, History of Science 61, 2003, s. 125–140.
Jardine, N., Frasca-Spada, M., „Splendours and Miseries of the Science Wars“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 28, 1997, s. 219–235.
Jardine, N., Scenes of Inquiry. On the Reality of Questions in Sciences, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1991.
Jardine, N., Secord, J. A., Spary, E. C. (eds.), Cultures of natural history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
Jardine, N., The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science: Kepler‘s A Defense of Tycho Against Ursus, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984.
Jenkins, E., „Why the History of Science“, in: Shortland, M., Warwick, A. (eds.), Teaching the History of Science, Blackwell, Oxford 1989.
Jones, R., „The Historiography of Science. Retrospect and Future Challenge“, in: M. Shortland, A. Warwick (eds.), Teaching the History of Science, s. 80-99.
Jordan, S. (ed.), Lexikon Geschichtswissenschaft. Hundert Grundbegriffe, Reclam, Stuttgart 2002.
Kaiser, D., „Training and the Generalist’s Vision in the History of Science“, Isis 96, 2005, s. 244–251.
Kann, Ch., „Zeichen – Ordnung – Gesetz: Zum Naturverständnis in der mittelalterlichen Philosophie“, in: P. Dilg (ed.), Natur im Mittelalter. Konzeptionen – Erfahrungen – Wirkung, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 2003, s. 33-49.
Knight, D. M., „The History of Science in Britain: A Personal View“, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftsgeschichte 15/2, 1984, s. 343–353.
Knorr-Cetina, K., Die Fabrikation der Erkenntnis. Zur Anthropologie der Naturwissenschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 1984.
Kohler, R. E., „A Generalist’s Vision“, Isis 96, 2005, s. 224–229.
Kohler, R. E., „Place and practice in field biology“, History of Science 40, 2002, s. 189–210.
Kohler, R. E., „Review: The Constructivists‘ Tool Kit“, Isis 90, 1999, s. 329–331.
Koselleck, R., „Fortschritt“, in: O. Brunner, W. Conze, R. Koselleck (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart 1972–1997, sv. II, s. 351–423.
Koselleck, R., Begriffsgeschichten. Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 2006.
Koyré, A., Metaphysics and Measurement. Essays in Scientific Revolution, Chapman & Hall, London 1968.
Koyré, A., Newtonian Studies, Chicago University Press, Chicago – London 1965.
Koyré, A., Od uzavřeného světa k nekonečnému vesmíru, přel. P. Horák, Vyšehrad, Praha 2004.
Koyré, A., The Astronomical Revolution. Copernicus – Kepler – Borelli, Methuen, London 1973,21980.
Kragh, H., An Introduction to the Historiography of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987.
Krebs, R. E., Groundbreaking Scientific Experiments, Inventions, and Discoveries of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, Greenwood Press, Westport – London 2004.
Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., J. Pinborg, The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism,1100-1600, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988.
Krige, J., Pestre, D. (eds.), Science in the Twentieth Century, Harwood, Amsterdam 1997.
Kubrin, D., „Newton and the Cyclical Cosmos: Providence and the Mechanical Philosophy“, Journal of the History of Ideas 28, 1967, s. 325–346.
Kuhn, T. S., The Copernican Revolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1957.
Kuhn, T., Struktura vědeckých revolucí, přel. T. Jeníček, OIKOYMENH, Praha 1997.
Kukla, A., Social Constructivism and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, London 2000.
Kusukawa, S., The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchton, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995.
Kvasz, L., O revolúciach vo vede a ruptúrach v jazyku vedy, Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Komenského, Bratislava 1998.
Lakatos, I., „History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions“, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970, s. 91–136.
Lakatos, I., Zahar, E., „Why did Copernicus‘s Research Program Supersed Ptolemy‘s?“ in: R. Westman (ed.), The Copernican Achievement, University of California Press, Berkeley – Los Angeles – London 1975, s. 355–383.
Lankford, J., „Amateurs versus Professionals: The Controversy over Telescope Size in Late Victorian Science“, Isis 72, 1981, s. 11–28.
Larvor, B., „Why did Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolution cause a fuss?“ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34, 2003, s. 369–390.
Latour, B., Nikdy sme neboli moderní, přel. M. Marcelli, Kalligram, Bratislava 2003.
Latour, B., Science in Action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1987.
Laudan, L., „The history of science and philosophy of science“, in: R. C. Olby (ed.), Companion to the history of modern science, s. 47–59.
Laudan, R., „Histories of the Sciences and Their Uses: A review to 1913“, History of Science 31, 1993, s. 1–33.
Laudan, R., „The „New“ History of Science: Implications for Philosophy of Science“, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992, vol. 2, s. 476–481.
Lawrence, Ch., Shapin, S. (eds.), Science Incarnate. Historical Embodiments of Natural Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1998.
Le Goff, J., Zrození očistce, přel. V. Dvořáková, Vyšehrad, Praha 2003.
Lefévre, W., Renn, J., Schoepflin, U. (eds.), The Power of Images in Early Modern Science, Birkhäuser, Basel 2003.
Lepenies, W., Das Ende der Naturgeschichte. Wandel kultureller Selbstverständlichkeiten in den Wissenschaften des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts, Hanser, München – Wien 1976.
Lightman, B., „Victorian Sciences and Religions: Discordant Harmonies“, Osiris, 2nd Ser. 16, 2001, s. 343–366.
Lindberg, D. C. (ed.), Science in Middle Ages, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1978.
Lindberg, D. C., Numbers, R. L. (eds.), God and Nature: Historial Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science, University of California Press, Berkeley – Los Angeles – London 1986.
Lindberg, D. C., Numbers, R. L. (eds.), When Science and Christianity Meet, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2003.
Lindberg, D. C., The Beginnings of Western Science. The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, 600 B.C. to A.D. 1450, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1992.
Lindberg, D. C., Westman, R. S. (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990.
Lynch, W. T., „The Utility of the Present in Reconstructing Science’s Past: Historical Counterfactuals and Contemporary Possibilities“, Scientia Poetica. Jahrbuch für Geschichte der Literatur und der Wissenschaften 8, 2004, s. 241–250.
Mackenzie, D., „Statistical theory and social interests: A case study“, Social Studies of Science 8, 1978, s. 35–83.
MacLachlan, J., „A Test of an „Imaginary“ Experiment of Galileo’s“, Isis 64, 1973, s. 374–379.
Machamer, P., „The Nature of Metaphor and Scientific Description“, in: F. Hallyn (ed.), Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences, Kluwer, Dordrecht – Boston – London 2000, s. 34-52.
Manuel, F., Isaac Newton, Historian, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1963.
Mayer, A. K., „Fatal Mutilations: Educationism and the British Background to the 1931 International Congress for the History of Science and Technology“, History of Science 40, 2002, s. 445–472.
Mayer, A.-K., „Moralizing Science: the uses of science’s past in national education in the 1920s“, British Journal for the History of Science 30, 1997, s. 51–70.
Mayer, A.-K., „Setting Up a Discipline: Conflicting Agendas of the Cambridge History of Science Commitee, 1936-1950“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31, 2000, s. 665–689.
Mayer, A.-K., Setting up a discipline, II: British history of science and „the end of ideology“, 1931-1948, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35, 2004, s. 41–72.
Mayr, E., „When is Historiography Whiggish?“ Journal of the History of Ideas 51, 1990, s. 301–309.
Mazal, O., Geschichte der abendländischen Wissenschaft des Mittelalters, 2 sv., Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz 2006.
McGuire, J. E., „Existence, Actuality and Necessity: Newton on Space and Time“, Annals of Science 35, 1978, s. 463–508.
McMullin, E., „History and Philosophy of Science: A Marriage of Convenience?“ PSA: Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974, s. 585–601.
Merton, R. K., The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1983.
Molnár, A., Na rozhraní věků. Cesty reformace, Kalich, Praha 2007.
Naylor, R., „Galieo, Copernicanism and the origins of the new science of motion“, British Journal for the History of Science 36, 2003, s. 151–181.
Naylor, S., „Introduction: historical geographies of science – places, contexts, cartographies“, British Journal for the History of Science 38, 2005, s. 1–12.
Neal, K., „The Rhetoric of Utility: Avoiding Occult Association for Mathematics Through Profitability and Pleasure“, History of Science 37, 1997, s. 151–177.
Nebelsick, H. P., Circles of God. Theology and Science from the Greeks to Copernicus, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburg 1985.
Nelson, A., „How Could Scientific Facts be Socially Constructed“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25, 1994, s. 535–547.
Nersessian, N., „Opening the Black Box: Cognitive Science and the History of Science“, Osiris, 2nd ser. 10, 1995, s. 194–211.
Neugebauer, O., The Exact Sciences in Antiquity, Munksgaard, Copenhagen 1951.
Nickles, T., „Philosophy of Science and History of Science“, Osiris, 2nd Ser. 10, 1995, s. 138–163.
Nier, K. A., „The Importance of Historical Accuracy in Philosophy of Science: The Case of Curd’s Conception of Copernican Rationality“, Philosophy of Science 53, 1986, s. 372–394.
Numbers, R. L., Science and Christianity in pulpit and pew, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007.
Nye, M. J., „Scientific Biography: History of Science by Another Means?“ Isis 97, 2006, s. 322–329.
Nyeová, M. J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 5: The Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.
Oakley, F., „Christian Theology and the Newtonian Science: The Rise of the Concept of the Laws of Nature“, Church History 30, 1961, s. 433–457.
Olby, R. C. (ed.), Companion to the history of modern science, Routledge, Princeton 1990, 21996.
Olson, R., „Physics“, in: G. B. Ferngren (ed.), Science and Religion, s. 301-313
Ophir, A., Shapin, S., „The Place of Knowledge: A Methodological Survey“, Science in Context 4, 1991, s. 3–21.
Osler, M. J. (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000.
Osler, M. J., „Eternal Truths and the Laws of Nature: The Theological Foundations of Descartes‘ Philosophy of Nature“, Journal of the History of Ideas 46, 1985, s. 349-362.
Osler, M. J., „Mixing Metaphors: Science and Religion or Natural Philosophy and Theology in Early Modern Europe“, History of Science 35, 1997, s. 91–113.
Otisk, M., Metafyzika jako věda. Ibn Síná a Ibn Rušd ve scholastické diskusi, Filosofia, Praha 2006.
Owens, L., „Pure and Sound Government: Laboratories, Playing Fields, and Gymnasia in the the Nineteenth-Century Search for Order“, Isis 76, 1985, s. 182–194.
Palmieri, P., „Galileo’s Construction of Idealized Fall in the Void“, History of Science 43, 2005, s. 343–389.
Palmieri, P., „Mental Models in Galileo’s early mathematization of nature“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34, 2003, s. 229–264.
Palmieri, P., „Re-examing Galileo’s Theory of Tides“, Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 53, 1998, s. 223–375.
Panchenko, D., „Thales’s Prediction of a Solar Eclipse“, Journal for the History of Astronomy 25, 1994, s. 275–288.
Pantin, I., „New Philosophy and Old Prejudices: Aspects of the Reception of Copernicanism in a Divided Europe“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30, 1999, s. 237–262.
Perel, J. G., Dějiny představ o vesmíru, přel. Z. Kos, Nakladatelství politické literatury, Praha 1964.
Pickering, A., „The Hunting of the Quark“, Isis 72, 1981, s. 216–236.
Pickstone, J., Porter, R., Schaffer, S., Shapin, S., Young, R. M., Ziman, J., „What is History of Science?“ History Today 35, 1985, č. 5, s. 46–53.
Pinnicková, C., Gale, G., „Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction“, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31, 2000, s. 109–125.
Pölmann, H. G., Kompendium evangelické dogmatiky, přel. P. Gallus a kol., Mlýn, Jihlava 2002.
Pomata, G., Siraisi, N. G. (eds.), Historia. Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. – London 2005.
Porter, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 4: Eighteenth-Century Science, Cambridge History of Science, Cambridge 2003.
Porter, R., „The History of Science and the History of Society“, in: R. C. Olby (ed.), Companion to the history of modern science, s. 32–46,
Porter, T. M., „Historizing the Two Cultures“, History of Science 43, 2005, s. 109–114.
Porter, T. M., „Is the Life of the Scientist a Scientific Unit?“ Isis 97, 2006, s. 314–321.
Prudovsky, G., „Can We Ascribe to Past Thinkers Concepts They had no Linguistic Means to Express?“ History and Theory 36, 1997, s. 15–31.
Pyenson, L., „Comparative History of Science“, History of Science 40, 2002, s. 1–33.
Pyenson, L., „Prerogatives of European Intellect: Historians of Science and the Promotion of Western Civilization“, History of Science 31, 1991, s. 289–315.
Quine, W. V. O., „Dvě dogmata empirismu“, in: Co je analytický výrok, sestavili a přeložili J. Peregrin, S. Sousedík, P. Sousedík, Praha 1995, s. 79–99.
Radder, H., „Philosophy and History of Science: Beyond the Kuhnian Paradigm“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 28, 1997, s. 633–655.
Ravetz, J., „Tragedy in History of Science“, in: M. Teich, R. Young (eds.), Changing Perspectives in the History of Science: Essays in Honour of Joseph Needham, London 1973, s. 204–222.
Ravetz, J., Westfall, R. S., „Marxism and the History of Science“, Isis 72, 1981, s. 393–405.
Redondi, P., Galileo Heretic, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1987.
Rehbock, P. F., „Huxley, Haeckel, and the Oceanographers: The Case of Bathybius haeckelii“, Isis 66, 1975, s. 504–533.
Reingold, N., „Science, Scientists, and Historian of Science“, History of Science 19, 1981, s. 274–283.
Ridley, M., Červená královna. Sexualita a vývoj lidské přirozenosti, přel. M. Konvička, Mladá fronta, Praha 1999.
Richards, J. L., „Introduction: Fragmented Lives“, Isis 97, 2006, s. 302–305.
Ritter, J., Gründer, K. (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, 13 sv., Schwabe, Basel 1971–2007.
Rosen, E., „Calvin’s Attitude Toward Copernicus“, Journal of the History of Ideas 21, 1960, s. 431–441.
Rosen, E., „Was Copernicus‘ Revolutions Approved by the Pope?“ Journal of the History of Ideas 36, 1975, s. 531–542.
Ross, S., „Scientist: The Story of a Word“, Annals of Science 18, 1962, s. 65–85.
Rossi, P., Die Geburt der modernen Wissenschaft in Europa, Beck, München 1997.
Rouse, J., „Philosophy of Science and the Persistent Narratives of Modernity“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 22, 1991, s. 141–162.
Rudwick, M. J. S., „The Strategy of Lyell’s Principles of Geology“, Isis 61, 1970, s. 4–33.
Rudwick, M., Coleman, W., Sylla, E., Daston, L., „Retrospective Review: Critical Problems in the History of Science“, Isis 71, 1981, s. 267-283.
Russell, C. A., „The Conflict of Science and Religion“, in: G. B. Ferngren (ed.), Science and Religion. A Historical Introduction, s. 3-12.
Sabra, A. I., „Situating Arabic Science: Locality versus Essence“, Isis 87, 1996, s. 654–670.
Sahotra, S. – Pfeifer, J. (eds.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, 2 sv., Routledge, New York 2006.
Saliba, G., Islamic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. – London 2007.
Sambursky, S., Das physikalische Weltbild der Antike, Artemis Verlag, Zürich – Stuttgart 1965.
Sandler, I., „Some Reflections on the Protean Nature of the Scientific Precursor, History of Science“, 17, 1979, s. 170–190.
Sartori, É., Velikáni francouzské vědy od Ambroise Paré po Pierre a Marie Curie, přel. E. Vergeinerová, J. Grospietsch, Krigl, Praha 2005
Secord, A., „Science in the pub: artisan botanists in early nineteenth-century Lancashire“, History of Science 32, 1994, s. 239–315.
Segre, M., „Light on the Galileo Case?“ Isis 88, 1997, s. 484–504.
Segre, M., „Zwischen Trient und Vatikanum II: Der Fall Galilei“, Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 26, 2003, s. 129–136.
Segre, M., In the Wake of Galileo, Rutgers University Press, New Jersey 1991.
Seife, Ch., Nula. Životopis jedné nebezpečné myšlenky, přel. J. a P. Houserovi, Argo – Dokořán, Praha 2005.
Sewell, K. C., „The ,Herbert Butterfield Problem’ and Its Resolution, Journal of the History of Ideas 64, 2003, s. 599–618.
Shapin, S., „,The Mind Is Its Own Place’: Science and Solitude in Seventeenth-Century England, Science in Context 4, 1990, s. 191–218.
Shapin, S., „Discipline and Bounding: The History and Sociology of Science As Seen Through the Externalism-Internalism Debate“, History of Science 30, 1992, s. 333–369.
Shapin, S., „Following Scientists Around“, Social Studies of Science 18, 1988, s. 533–550.
Shapin, S., „History of Science and Its Sociological Reconstructions“, History of Science 20, 1982, s. 157–209.
Shapin, S., „Hyperprofessionalism and the Crisis of Readership in the History of Science“, Isis 96, 2005, s. 238–243.
Shapin, S., „Placing the View from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in location of science“, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23, 1998, s. 5-–2.
Shapin, S., „Social Uses of Science“, in: G. S. Rousseau, R. Porter (eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge. Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1980, s. 93–140.
Shapin, S., „The Philosopher and the Chicken. On the Dietetics of Disembodied Knowledge“, Ch. Lawrence, S. Shapin (eds.), Science Incarnate, s. 21–50.
Shapin, S., A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1995.
Shapin, S., Schaffer, S., Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1985.
Shapin, S., Talking History: Reflections on Discourse Analysis, Isis 75, 1984, s. 125–130.
Shapin, S., The Scientific Revolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago – London 1996
Sheets-Peynson, S., „New Directions for Scientific Biography: The Case of Sir William Dawson“, History of Science 28, 1990, s. 399–410.
Shortland, M., „Darkness visible: underground culture in the golden age of geology“, History of Science 32, 1994, s. 1–61.
Shortland, M., Warwick, A. (eds.), Teaching the History of Science, Blackwell, Oxford 1989.
Scheibe, E., „Missverstandene Wissenschaft“, in B. O. Küppers (ed.), Die Einheit der Wirklichkeit: zum Wissenschaftsverständnis der Gegenwart, Fink, München 2000, s. 69–88.
Schickore, J., „(Ab)Using the Past for Present Purposes“, Perspectives on Science 10, 2002, s. 433–455.
Schmitt, Ch., Skinner, Q. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991.
Schwartz Cowan, R., „Francis Galton‘s statistical ideas: The influence of eugenics“, Isis 63, 1972, s. 509–528.
Skinner, Q., „Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas“, History and Theory 8, 1969, s. 3-53.
Smocovitis, V. B., „Contextualizing Science: From Science Studies to Cultural Studies“, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994, vol. 2, s. 402–412.
Snobelen, S. D., „Isaac Newton, heretic: the strategies of a Nicodemite“, British Journal for the History of Science 32, 1999, s. 381–419.
Sobol, P. G., „Review: R. E. Krebs, Scientific Development and Misconceptions through the Ages: A Reference Guide“, Isis 91, 2000, s. 761–762.
Söderqvist, T. (ed.), The Historiography of Contemporary Science and Technology, Routledge, Amsterdam 1997.
Söderqvist, T., „What is the use of writing lives of recent scientist?“ in: R. E. Doel, T. Söderqvist, The Historiography of Contemporary Science, Technology and Medicine. Writing recent science, s. 99–117.
Sorrenson, R., „The Ship as a scientific instrument in the eighteenth century“, Osiris, 2nd Ser. 11, 1996, s. 221–236.
Southgate, B. C., „,Forgotten and Lost’: Some Reactions to Autonomous Science in the 17th Century“, Journal of the History of Ideas 50, 1989, s. 249–268.
Spoerhase, C., „Zwischen den Zeiten: Anachronismus und Präsentismus in der Methodologie der historischen Wissenschaften“, Scientia Poetica. Jahrbuch für Geschichte der Literatur und der Wissenschaften 8, 2004, s. 169–240.
Steinle, F., Burian, R. M., „Introduction: History of Science and Philosophy of Science“, Perspectives of Science 10, 2003, s. 391–397.
Stephenson, F. R., Fatoohi, L. J., „Thales’s Prediction of a Solar Eclipse“, Journal for the History of Astronomy 28, 1997, s. 279–282.
Stewart, L., „Seeing Through the Scholium: Religion and Reading Newton in the Eighteenth Century“, History of Science 34, 1996, s. 123–165.
Stewart, L., The Rise of Public Science: Rhetoric, Technology, and Natural Philosophy in Newtonian Britain, 1660-1750, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992.
Stump, J. B., „History of Science throught Koyré’s Lenses“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32, 2001, s. 243–263.
Swerdlow, N. M., „Montucla‘s Legacy: The History of the Exact Sciences“, Journal of the History of Ideas 54, 1993, s. 299–328.
Špelda, D., „Astronomie a idea teoretického pokroku“, Aluze. Revue pro literaturu, filosofii a jiné 8, 2005, č. 3, s. 124-145.
Špelda, D., „Quae supra nos, nihil ad nos: Vztah církevních otců k astronomii“, Listy filologické 130, 2007, v tisku.
Terall, M., „Biography as Cultural History of Science, Isis 97, 2006, s. 306–313.
Thackray, A., „History of Science in the 1980s“, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 12, 1981, s. 299–314.
Thackray, A., „Natural Knowledge in Cultural Context: The Manchester Model“, The American Historical Review 79, 1974, s. 672–709.
Thackray, A., „The Historians and the Progress of Science“, Science, Technology & Human Values 10, 1985, s. 17–27.
Thackray, A., „The pre-history of an academic discipline. The study of the history of science in the United States“, Minerva 18, 1980, s. 448–473, repr. in: E. Mendelssohn (ed.), Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984, s. 395–420.
Thackray, A., Merton, R. K., „On Discipline Building: The Paradoxes of George Sarton“, Isis 63, 1972, s. 472–495.
Thurston, H., „Greek Mathematical Astronomy Reconsidered“, Isis 93, 2002, s. 58–69.
Tosh, N., „Anachronism and retrospective explanation: in defence of a present-centred history of science“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34, 2003, s. 647–659.
Tosh, N., „Science, truth and history, Part I. Historiography, relativism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37, 2006, s. 675–701; „Science, truth and history, Part. II. Metaphysical bolt-holes for the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge?, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38, 2007, s. 185–209.
Toulmin, S., Cosmopolis. The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1990.
Tresmontat, C., Základy teologie, přel. I. Lukáš, A. Rezová, Barrister & Principal, Brno 1995.
Trout, J. D., „A Realistic Look Backward“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25, 1994, s. 37–64.
Vernant, J.-P., Počátky řeckého myšlení, OIKOYMENH, přel. M. Rejchrt, Praha 1993
Vicedo, M., „Is the History of Science Relevant to the Philosophy of Science?“ PSA: Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2 1992, s. 490-496.
Vickers, B. (ed.), Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984.
Waardenburg, J., Bohové zblízka. Systematický úvod do religionistiky, přel. B. Horyna, Masarykova Univerzita – Georgetown, Brno 1997.
Wall, B. E., „Anatomy of Precursor: The Historiography of Aristarchos of Samos“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 6, 1975, s. 201–228.
Washner, R., „Demokrit und die Quantenmechanik oder Erwin Schrödingers Rezeption des griechischen Atomismus“, in: H. Grössing (ed.), Themen der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Wien – München 1999, s. 35–49.
Weber, M., „Protestantská etika a duch kapitalismu“, in: M. Weber, Metodologie, sociologie a politika, přel. M. Havelka, OIKOYMENH, Praha 1998, s. 185–245.
Webster, Ch., From Paracelsus to Newton. Magic and the Making of Modern Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1980.
Webster, Ch., The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform, 1626 – 1660, Duckworth, London 1975.
Weinberg, S., Snění o finální teorii, přel. kolektiv pod vedením J. Bičáka, Hynek, Praha 1996.
Weinert, F., „Die Arbeit der Geschichte: Ein Vergleich der Analysemodelle von Kuhn und Foucault“, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie XIII/2, 1982, s. 336–358.
Weisheipl, J. A., „The Nature, Scope, and Classification of the Sciences“, in D. Lindberg (ed.), Science in Middle Ages, Chicago 1978, s. 461-482.
Weisheipl, J. A., „The Nature, Scope, and Classification of the Sciences“, in: D. Lindberg (ed.), Science in Middle Ages, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1978, s. 461–482.
Weizsäcker, C. F. von, Die Tragweite der Wissenschaft. Schöpfung und Weltentstehung. Die Geschichte zweier Begriffe, S. Hirzel, Stuttgart 1964.
Westfall, R. S., „Technical Newton“, Isis 87, 1996, s. 701–706.
Westfall, R., „Science and Patronage: Galileo and the Telescope“, Isis 76, 1985, s. 11–30.
Westfall, R., Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1980.
Westfall, R., The Life of Isaac Newton, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993.
Westman, R. S., „The Astronomer’s Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study“, History of Science 18, 1980, s. 105–147.
Westman, R. S., „The Copernicans and the Churches“, in: D. C. Lindberg, R. L. Numbers (eds.), God and Nature, s. 76-113.
Westman, R. S., „Two Cultures or One?: A Second Look at Kuhn’s The Copernican Revolution“, Isis 85, 1994, s. 79–115.
Westman, R., „Proof, Poetics and Patronage: Copernicus‘ Preface to De revolutionibus“, in: Lindberg, D. C., Westman, R. S. (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge 1990, s. 167–205.
Westman, R., „Proof, Poetics and Patronage: Copernicus‘ Preface to De revolutionibus“, in: D. C. Lindberg, R. S. Westman (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, s. 167–205.
Whithers, C. W. J., „Towards a history of geography in the public sphere“, History of Science 37, 1999, 45–78.
Wildiers, M., Weltbild und Theologie. Vom Mittelalter bis heute, Benziger, Zürich – Köln 1974.
Williams, L. P., „Review: G. Sarton, A History of Science, Vol. 2“, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11, 1960, s. 159–161.
Williams, L. P., „Review: J. D. Bernal, Science in History“, Isis 48, 1957, s. 471–473.
Williams, L. P., „Should Philosophers Be Allowed to write History“, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26, 1975, s. 241–253.
Williams, L. P., „The Historiography of Victorian Science“, Victorian Studies 9, 1965-66, s. 197–204.
Wilson, D. B., The Historiography of Science and Religion, in: G. B. Ferngren (ed.), Science and Religion, s. 13–29.
Wittkau-Horgby, A., „,Unintended Consequences of Scientific Discoveries’. Oder: Die Heterogenie der Zwecke als Phänomen der Wissenschaftsgeschichte“, Sudhoffs Archiv 85, 2001, s. 223–238.
Wojcik, J. W., „Pursuing Knowledge: Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton“, in: M. J. Osler (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge Univesity Press, Cambridge 2000, s. 183–200.
Wolff, M., Geschichte der Impetustheorie. Untersuchungen zum Ursprung der klassischen Mechanik, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. 1978.
Wuketits, F. M., Přírodní katastrofa jménem člověk. Vývoj bez pokroku, přel. V. Daňková, Granit, Praha 2006.
Yates, F., Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, Vintage Books, New York 21969.
Yearley, S., Making Sense of Science. Understanding Sense of Science, SAGE Publications, London 2005.
Yeo, R., „Genius, Method, and Morality: Images of Newton in Britain, 1760-1860“, Science in Context 2, 1988, s. 257–284.
Youngson, R. M., Vědecké omyly, bludy a podvrhy, přel. V. Schreiber, H & H, Praha 2004.
Zambelli, P., The Speculum Astronomie and Its Enigma. Astrology, Theology, and Science in Albertus Magnus and his Contemporaries, Kluwer, Dordrecht – Boston – London 1992.