Tato práce pojednává o vojenské intervenci v Libyi v roce 2011. Konkrétně o operaci NATO, nazvané Sjednocený ochránce. Tato operace trvala sedm měsíců a vojensky se na ní podílelo osmnáct členských států NATO. Z techto osmnácti států byly tři státy pro úspěšné uskutečnění operace klíčové. USA, Francie a Velká Británi. Cílem této práce je na základě vojensko - politické podpory operace těmito třemi státy zjistit, zda by bylo možné operaci realizovat bez participace USA.
Annotation in English
This thesis is about military intervention in Libya in 2011. Concretely about NATO operation called Unified Protector. This operation lasted seven months and eighteen members of NATO militarily contributed. Out of these eighteen states, three of them were crucial for its successful completion. USA, France and United Kingdom. The goal of this thesis is to find out, whether this operation would be possible to realize without participation of USA, based on the degree of military and policy support of these states to the OUP.
Keywords
NATO, USA, Libye, občanská válka, vojenská intervence, odpovědnost chránit, Arabské jaro
Keywords in English
NATO, USA, Libye, civil war, military intervention, responsibility to protect, Arab spring
Length of the covering note
52 s. (72 632).
Language
CZ
Annotation
Tato práce pojednává o vojenské intervenci v Libyi v roce 2011. Konkrétně o operaci NATO, nazvané Sjednocený ochránce. Tato operace trvala sedm měsíců a vojensky se na ní podílelo osmnáct členských států NATO. Z techto osmnácti států byly tři státy pro úspěšné uskutečnění operace klíčové. USA, Francie a Velká Británi. Cílem této práce je na základě vojensko - politické podpory operace těmito třemi státy zjistit, zda by bylo možné operaci realizovat bez participace USA.
Annotation in English
This thesis is about military intervention in Libya in 2011. Concretely about NATO operation called Unified Protector. This operation lasted seven months and eighteen members of NATO militarily contributed. Out of these eighteen states, three of them were crucial for its successful completion. USA, France and United Kingdom. The goal of this thesis is to find out, whether this operation would be possible to realize without participation of USA, based on the degree of military and policy support of these states to the OUP.
Keywords
NATO, USA, Libye, občanská válka, vojenská intervence, odpovědnost chránit, Arabské jaro
Keywords in English
NATO, USA, Libye, civil war, military intervention, responsibility to protect, Arab spring
Research Plan
Zpracování materiálu a vypracování bakalářské práce podle projektu schváleného Oborovou radou studia.
Research Plan
Zpracování materiálu a vypracování bakalářské práce podle projektu schváleného Oborovou radou studia.
Recommended resources
Brzezinski, Ian (2011). Lesson From Libya: NATO Alliance Remains Relevant.
National Defense (vol. 96 Issue 696). s. 18 ? 19.
Daddler, Ivo H. ? Stavridis, James G. (2012). NATO´s Victory in Libya. Foreign affairs (vol. 91 Issue 2). s. 2 ? 7.
Gearon, Eamonn (2012). Libya: Where have all the weapons gone?. Middle East (Issue 429). s. 33 ? 35.
Halabi, Sam ? Foster (2012). Traditions of belligerent recognition: The Libyan intervention in historical and theoretical context. American university international law review (vol. 27 Issue 2), s. 321 ? 389.
Kitchen, Veronica M. (2010). The Globalization of NATO: Intervention, Security and Identity (Routledge Global Security Studies) (London: Routledge).
NATO (2011). Life after Qadhafi (http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/news_79893.htm, 23. 3. 2013).
Pattison, James (2011). The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention in Libya. Ethics & International Affairs (Cambridge University Press) (vol. 25 Issue 3). s. 271 ? 277.
Rasmussen, Anders Fogh (2011). NATO after Libya. Foreign Affairs (vol. 90 Issue 4). s. 2 ? 6.
Samples, John (2012). Lessons and warnings from the Libyan intervention. USA Today magazine (vol. 140 Issue 2800). S. 40 ? 41.
Williams, Paul ? Scharf, Michael P. (2000). NATO Intervention on Trial: The Legal Case That Was Never Made. Human rights review (vol. 1 Issue 2). s. 103.
Recommended resources
Brzezinski, Ian (2011). Lesson From Libya: NATO Alliance Remains Relevant.
National Defense (vol. 96 Issue 696). s. 18 ? 19.
Daddler, Ivo H. ? Stavridis, James G. (2012). NATO´s Victory in Libya. Foreign affairs (vol. 91 Issue 2). s. 2 ? 7.
Gearon, Eamonn (2012). Libya: Where have all the weapons gone?. Middle East (Issue 429). s. 33 ? 35.
Halabi, Sam ? Foster (2012). Traditions of belligerent recognition: The Libyan intervention in historical and theoretical context. American university international law review (vol. 27 Issue 2), s. 321 ? 389.
Kitchen, Veronica M. (2010). The Globalization of NATO: Intervention, Security and Identity (Routledge Global Security Studies) (London: Routledge).
NATO (2011). Life after Qadhafi (http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/news_79893.htm, 23. 3. 2013).
Pattison, James (2011). The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention in Libya. Ethics & International Affairs (Cambridge University Press) (vol. 25 Issue 3). s. 271 ? 277.
Rasmussen, Anders Fogh (2011). NATO after Libya. Foreign Affairs (vol. 90 Issue 4). s. 2 ? 6.
Samples, John (2012). Lessons and warnings from the Libyan intervention. USA Today magazine (vol. 140 Issue 2800). S. 40 ? 41.
Williams, Paul ? Scharf, Michael P. (2000). NATO Intervention on Trial: The Legal Case That Was Never Made. Human rights review (vol. 1 Issue 2). s. 103.